Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
13:57 - I dont think that AI will want something. We want stuff because of evolu…
ytc_UgwVRR474…
G
ChatGPT gave that bad advice because earlier models relied on surface-level chem…
ytc_UgzKNjioI…
G
i don't understand what the threat is? it's not like ai is a species that exists…
ytc_UgzT_6lUv…
G
I argued peacefully with ChatGPT about sexualities... And i needed to prove it m…
ytr_UgzBtEGo6…
G
Whens the "tech Billionaires run a successful business without depending on gove…
rdc_m6yug8y
G
I thought I was prepared. I’ve read about AI ethics, alignment problems, papercl…
ytc_Ugzkpt2jy…
G
Similarly, I heard of efforts to estimate chances of short term survival for tra…
rdc_f1eirvp
G
Ah but when AI is recognized as a sentence life form and demands compensation th…
ytc_UgwczjSTy…
Comment
Apparently you can toggle the accuracy settings on Amazon's tech. According to Amazon, the ACLU ran the test with the AI at 80%.
A toggle-able accuracy setting is an issue in itself, of course, but if you set it at 80 and get 80, maybe there's something there to delve into...
reddit
AI Harm Incident
1565793477.0
♥ 1
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"rdc_ewuwql7","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_ewsv6x2","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"rdc_ewsmh6i","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_ewth5hs","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"rdc_ewu0s5q","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"resignation"}
]