Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G Let him go down there to Africa so someone can put a bullet in his skull.… rdc_jrzteze G Ah thank you so much for this! I’m just a hobby artist but I love art so much. Y… ytc_Ugy39ev9w… G Phenomenal work my friend! I have gotten closer to AI over the last month Ive ra… ytc_UgzHnScBg… G Yes when you're replaced with AI you can just go away and fie for all they care.… ytc_Ugz-xtR6j… G Here’s a Siri Shortcut I made that let’s you converse with ChatGPT with your voi… rdc_jf6tz2d G Digital art still requires an artist, AI art Sole purpose is image skimming and … ytc_Ugz3GUzAh… G I highly doubt that an AI would have any tells when it comes to lying..… ytc_Ugwewx--6… G 19:34 No. You should have said there: "What's this climate change thing? Yeah,… ytc_UgxV7h_cD…
Comment
actually, since the problem is *very* highly biased to seeing negative examples, and you can go back to the old fashioned method of checking if it's the right person if it fails, it's probably better to skew towards false positives than false negatives. Because a classifier is *going* to have to make that trade-off.
reddit AI Harm Incident 1530824453.0 ♥ 2
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitynone
Reasoningutilitarian
Policynone
Emotionindifference
Coded at2026-04-25T08:13:13.233606
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"rdc_e1tvb3c","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"rdc_e1ul7av","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"rdc_e1ur9l2","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"rdc_e1uxf04","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"rdc_e27epfp","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"} ]