Raw LLM Responses

I believe he's talking about solving the moral dilemma. Here is the nature of the dilemma. Imagine that in the not-too-distant future, you own a self-driving car. One day, while you are driving along, an unfortunate set of events causes the car to head toward a crowd of 10 people crossing the road. It cannot stop in time but it can avoid killing 10 people by steering into a wall. However, this collision would kill you, the owner and occupant. What should it do? Obviously one person dying is better than 10. But people won't buy a car programmed to kill them. They'll continue to drive manually, and their human error will kill more people. Basically there will be scenarios in which a computer will decide who lives and who dies, and it makes people uncomfortable.