Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I'm very much expecting a bad outcome to the AI revolution that will see unemplo…
ytc_Ugy61v3kT…
G
I have come across and watched three separate videos from varying sources, each …
ytc_UgzNE-1_K…
G
I had a dispute with my son about a legal question whether simply breaking priso…
ytc_UgzUDu352…
G
I'd rather consult GPT than a doctor who is in the profession solely for the mon…
ytc_UgzTdMhzl…
G
It's been my experience so far that AI is just as likely to give me wrong IT inf…
ytc_UgxCGy87y…
G
Controversy 1
AI can never do word to word specific rendering so you can never …
ytc_UgwywJbOX…
G
I have 2, 2018 autopilot and 2025 full self drive. Autopilot does not drive in t…
ytc_UgzLiEzN4…
G
To me, the very idea of calling AI generated images "Art" or "AI Art" makes no s…
ytc_UgwrwXK9R…
Comment
If we ever get to the utopia then no one will be able to imagine how it could have ever been any other way. The hard part is getting there from here.
If someone drills and strikes oil they won't give it away, even if it then comes out of the ground just for the price of pumping. They want to pay the expenses they have already incurred, save for the next search for oil, pay salaries, pay shareholders. If they buy a robot to do the work for free they will want to recoup that cost. At first they will still not have machines to predict where to drill and repair the robots.
If farmers bought robots to farm for free they would not give away the produce for free. They would need money to provide for their families, pay property taxes on their acreage, etc. I knew a guy who had a few horses and cattle on a few acres. But he had some equipment and he made deals with larger landowners to cut their hay, bale it, haul it to their barns, and keep half of the bales for himself to haul away. Government might make a similar deal to provide all of the robots, for half of the produce. But remember, oil is not free yet. And the cheaper the government's half of the food is, the less the farmers can make for their half.
The same goes for the factories and the stores. People have invested money, and will need a return for their investment. Who loses? The people who built things, the people who loaned them the money, or the rest of society who will pay them off? Socialist countries typically "nationalized" the means of production, meaning the nation owned (took) them. So, Cuba took the sugar cane fields, and Coca Cola was out of luck, losing what they had bought. Even though relations are normalizing, Coke isn't getting the fields back.
Somehow you have to reach an tipping point, and get to a "new normal." The transition can be painful, chaotic, and unfair.
reddit
AI Moral Status
1465164137.0
♥ 2
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | unclear |
| Reasoning | unclear |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | unclear |
| Coded at | 2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452 |
Raw LLM Response
[{"id":"rdc_d3xiotr","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_d3xgl7d","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"rdc_d3xyeyx","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"rdc_d3xaxb3","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"rdc_d3xc1e8","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"})