Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
The closing statement I fully agree with, which is the main reason I'm not that …
ytc_UgwvccLZL…
G
Good to see the face of the content creator as many new users may have got the f…
ytc_UgzeTcpZA…
G
This is one of those legendary stories that may not be true, but it's relevant:
…
rdc_j4z4on4
G
Completely ignores when companies said they were laying off because of AI, but w…
ytc_Ugwil9ts9…
G
11:30 do not even consider that EM never before thought about this kind of quest…
ytc_Ugx_t1jPy…
G
People dont see the world the way it is.. They see it the way THEY ARE.
Maybe th…
ytc_UgyUDVZmo…
G
I am neither for or against Ai, but I think part of what gave rise to it is simi…
ytc_UgzB3Qgk1…
G
Thank you for your observation! It's interesting that you see a resemblance to J…
ytr_UgydRwgK3…
Comment
They'll have a great self-driving car service, until we find out that they decided not to do recalls and try to hide all of the evidence, again.
reddit
AI Harm Incident
1451932377.0
♥ 2
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"rdc_cym15cb","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"rdc_cylrhx7","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"rdc_cym1m2j","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_cymh8ru","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"rdc_cylmzjw","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}
]