Raw LLM Responses

> Your definition of credibility is the one used to demobilise and disassemble people. A definition that appears as your own but is really originating from the ruling power in this society. You're absolutely right, I was intentionally using that exact definition because the direction of my argument was that you wouldn't be able to mobilize the moral majority after the fact. The ruling power uses that viewpoint to circumvent a moral majority from acting on behalf of the powerless protesters/rioters, and that was the final conclusion of my argument. I'm not passing moral condemnation on protesters or rioters, I'm saying the masses won't move for them now. There may in fact be a rich vein of riot-redeeming literature, but I don't think you can change the popular opinion with it, and that's the crux of my argument.