Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

in Gemini for Science is honestly one of the most exciting parts here. If AI can ge… 7463621136371… in Frankly, the pope hasn’t really done right by girls so he’s just kind of just an… 7464803906599… in Too real. AI can be wrong with the confidence of a senior consultant and then ge… 7467572205946… in Your point about token based pricing turning AI into a costly tool highlights wh… 7465425265876… in The value of AI isn't just finding answers faster, it's giving researchers the f… 7466591594260… in Matthew Kilkenny Thank you Matthew. Roman Yampolski says AI safety is unsolvable… 7465240065565… in Posted over two years ago lets hope the EU AI ACT has imbedded the values of Pop… 7465182964457… in Soon down the road, at this scale, AI will likely run out of compute capacity to… 7465078937405…

Comment

Clara Hawking — Clara — your framing of governance as "a process of shared discernment" is the line I will carry from your reflection. It reframes everything. You are right to call out the speed of confident summaries. I read it on the day — Bank Holiday Monday, hottest May day in British history, dog on the balcony — and I was honest with myself: this is a first read, not a deep read. What I could do was notice what resonated. Three things did, immediately and deeply: that AI is not morally neutral, that a more moral AI is not enough if that morality is determined by a few, and that someone must always be answerable — an algorithm cannot be. Pope Leo XIV opened his encyclical with a question: are we building a new Tower of Babel, or a city where humanity can flourish together? I think that question deserves a serious answer — not from theologians alone, but from every engineer, every executive, and every board that is currently making decisions about how AI enters their organisation. Thank you for modelling what slow, serious reading looks like. I will be coming back to your reflections as mine deepen too. Magnifica Humanitas is worth reading. Whatever your faith, philosophy or practice.

LinkedIn AI Policy & Regulation Chief AI Officer by engagement | AI Systems Eng… 2026-05-26T11:0…

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Primary value	accountability
Secondary value	beneficence
Alignment target	humanity
Stance	demanding
Emotion	approval
Value justification	The speaker emphasizes that 'someone must always be answerable — an algorithm cannot be', highlighting the importance of accountability in AI development.
Target justification	The speaker suggests that the question of building a city where humanity can flourish together 'deserves a serious answer — not from theologians alone, but from every engineer, every executive, and every board', indicating a focus on the well-being of humanity as a whole.
Coded at	2026-06-11T08:15:04Z

Raw LLM Response

```
{
  "value_primary": "accountability",
  "value_secondary": "beneficence",
  "target": "humanity",
  "stance": "demanding",
  "emotion": "approval",
  "value_justification": "The speaker emphasizes that 'someone must always be answerable — an algorithm cannot be', highlighting the importance of accountability in AI development.",
  "target_justification": "The speaker suggests that the question of building a city where humanity can flourish together 'deserves a serious answer — not from theologians alone, but from every engineer, every executive, and every board', indicating a focus on the well-being of humanity as a whole."
}
```

Raw LLM Responses