Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
in
Most founders frame this as an AI capability discussion. It's actually a system …
7464989847120…
in
This is a significant shift in the AI governance conversation because it moves A…
7465110075464…
in
Demis, regarding this I/O update and the push for "agentic" routing: your new ha…
7466328706416…
in
We'd better begin ramping up our human capital in the west. My decades-long plan…
7463554151877…
in
Important perspective. The conversation around AI is no longer just about capabi…
7466079026550…
in
Agreed. As AI tools continue to proliferate, the real value will be in platforms…
7466842781836…
in
The decline in Stack Overflow usage does not necessarily mean the end of learnin…
7466866541276…
in
"If AI takes over the work, what role do humans play?" The real misunderstanding…
7464002284494…
Comment
Robert Studholme in my cloister/starship class I do exactly that after forcing them to read in class and argmapping in groups and restricting the domain to only a few papers they can use. And I agree that for some students that play along seem to work well and they quickly realise that good AI work is more time consuming than the old school approach. Because the helpful bit is adversarial mode and it basically asks the student to do an extra layer of work. But I have the nagging feeling that in my class they do it, in other classes they adapt it to become an anti-detection strategy. I feel a bit guilty at times I might be enabling significantly more advanced cheating strategies. It is also confusing the Academic Integrity process because a student can play dumb and say that the different confusing practices around AI, some people banning it, some people actively encouraging within guardrails like we experimented, has generated whatever cheating they are being accused off.
LinkedIn
AI Research & Models
Senior Lecturer at University of Southampton
2026-05-26T10:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Primary value | accountability |
| Secondary value | honesty |
| Alignment target | individual_users |
| Stance | critical |
| Emotion | fear |
| Value justification | The speaker wants AI to be used in a way that promotes accountability and honesty, by making students do extra work to verify AI-generated content. |
| Target justification | The target of the speaker's concern is individual students, who may be using AI to cheat or develop anti-detection strategies. |
| Coded at | 2026-06-11T08:14:41Z |
Raw LLM Response
```
{
"value_primary": "accountability",
"value_secondary": "honesty",
"target": "individual_users",
"stance": "critical",
"emotion": "fear",
"value_justification": "The speaker wants AI to be used in a way that promotes accountability and honesty, by making students do extra work to verify AI-generated content.",
"target_justification": "The target of the speaker's concern is individual students, who may be using AI to cheat or develop anti-detection strategies."
}
```