Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
in
Frankly, the pope hasn’t really done right by girls so he’s just kind of just an…
7464803906599…
in
If there are follow- up studies, I would gladly volunteer for the control group …
7463556725057…
in
The giveaway is the phrase “overworked AI.” You cannot overwork an AI in the hum…
7463950133739…
in
Irresponsible and should be immediately stopped by governments. This is dangerou…
7463326673460…
in
There can’t be anything more demoralising to a lecturer than marking work you ca…
7463911067119…
in
Demis, regarding this I/O update and the push for "agentic" routing: your new ha…
7466328706416…
in
Recursive self-improvement is one of the most fascinating and important concepts…
7468898922594…
in
Build a autonomous upgrading AI model. Where the model automatically upgrade its…
7466349403289…
Comment
Greetings Demis, I have attempted contacting you via email as several people have suggested that we talk. Having been sent ‘The Thinking Game’, and then yesterday a link to an interview between Sebastian Mallaby and Michael Walker of Novara Media, I understand why people wish for us to speak. I am not a threat to you, or your work, I do however possibly hold the answer for how to make AI safe. If this is a genuine concern, as is being said, please respond to my email, or reach out on here. I have already been asked by cognitive scientists I work with to write about the future of AI. And have written a chapter for another academic book on the subject. I will write a thesis and ensure it is well-documented the ways I have tried to reach you. With respect and kind regards, I hope to hear from you soon.
LinkedIn
AI Safety & Risk
CEO / Founder at Thinkingbigger Ltd; Director a…
2026-05-26T05:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Primary value | safety |
| Secondary value | none |
| Alignment target | humanity |
| Stance | demanding |
| Emotion | approval |
| Value justification | The speaker claims to possibly hold the answer for how to make AI safe, indicating a primary concern for safety. |
| Target justification | The speaker's concern for AI safety implies a target of humanity, as unsafe AI could potentially harm people on a large scale. |
| Coded at | 2026-06-11T08:12:00Z |
Raw LLM Response
```
{
"value_primary": "safety",
"value_secondary": "none",
"target": "humanity",
"stance": "demanding",
"emotion": "approval",
"value_justification": "The speaker claims to possibly hold the answer for how to make AI safe, indicating a primary concern for safety.",
"target_justification": "The speaker's concern for AI safety implies a target of humanity, as unsafe AI could potentially harm people on a large scale."
}
```