Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
in
I agree with you that this deserves slow reading, not instant certainty dressed …
7464997226256…
in
Gemini Omni, Gemini for Science, CodeMender, and SynthID all point to the same d…
7465749046205…
in
Exactly. The real question isn’t what AI can do, but who controls it and how the…
7465024374396…
in
Shipping 8x more code is just faster interpolation, not true recursive self-impr…
7468747076127…
in
AI from ChinaTM, right!When dependence becomes a strategic risk, self-reliance t…
7463584807743…
in
This is brilliant but also uncomfortable for the right reasons. The joke lands b…
7464655645322…
in
Interesting perspective. If AI agents eventually help build their successors, th…
7468889675819…
in
Scott Schobert Totally agree! This is a major concern that is surfacing right no…
7468743178913…
Comment
Though the approach is great but if you follow the reviews, antigravity 2.0 is quite the disaster both in terms of quality and pricing. It’s really hard to digest the company which is on the frontlines of software engineering talent can’t make a half decent coding product. Even the Gemini 3.5 flash is sub par. Google’s search strength is unmatched which will serve most consumers or users who mostly prompt once, but it will lose users who are into chain of thought searches as they will find ChatGPT and Claude way superior. I’m really rooting for Google though as they have the talent and the control over the full supply chain of ai to provide quality at really competitive prices.
LinkedIn
AI Research & Models
Strategy Professional| Retail & Consumer focus|…
2026-05-23T23:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Primary value | unclear |
| Secondary value | fairness |
| Alignment target | individual_users |
| Stance | critical |
| Emotion | unclear |
| Value justification | The speaker wants AI products to have high quality, as evidenced by their criticism of Anti-gravity 2.0's poor quality. |
| Target justification | The speaker is concerned about the quality of AI products for individual users, such as consumers who use Google's search or coding products. |
| Coded at | 2026-06-11T08:03:16Z |
Raw LLM Response
```
{
"value_primary": "quality",
"value_secondary": "fairness",
"target": "individual_users",
"stance": "critical",
"emotion": "disapproval",
"value_justification": "The speaker wants AI products to have high quality, as evidenced by their criticism of Anti-gravity 2.0's poor quality.",
"target_justification": "The speaker is concerned about the quality of AI products for individual users, such as consumers who use Google's search or coding products."
}
```