Browse Comments — Raw (as collected)

TBF, I can't think of a single company I would trust to self-regulate on anything. AI just happens to be the worst offender right now.

What strikes me most - EQ starts with knowing yourself, not managing others. Everything else on this list is downstream of that one thing.

Alba Haavisto Baeza

The highest performers are rarely the smartest in the room, they are the ones who read the room best.

​A phenomenal perspective on what's happening in the UAE right now. Dubai and Abu Dhabi are rapidly moving from an emerging hub to an absolute gravity well for deep-tech innovation. They are setting a massive pace for global digital transformation. ​As these state-backed ecosystems grow, the demand for scalable AI automation, hardened layer infrastructures, and enterprise-grade system resilience is going to skyrocket. Organizations that align their tech stacks today will have a distinct competitive edge tomorrow. ​For those looking to map out their technical architecture, deploy secure AI integrations, or optimize their engineering roadmap for this new era, my DMs are always open. I’m always happy to offer a consultation and discuss.

The agent challenges you flagged are worth pausing on. Loose permissions and vague tasks are not edge cases, they are the default in most early rollouts., Luís Rodrigues

As the Pink Floyd song goes: "Welcome... to... the machine." Certainly we will need societal adjustment, as far as how humans and AI will co-exist. AI should remain an accelerator and facilitator, not a human displacement or replacement, though many jobs will be not just augmented, but eliminated.

Real emotional intelligence shows up less in definitions and more in how someone handles tension, feedback, and disagreement in real time. The strongest performers tend to build trust not by avoiding emotion, but by managing it in a way that keeps relationships and decisions steady. Justin Wright 🙌

Treating the four layers as one body rather than four purchases explains why a strong model still underperforms in a weak stack.

Ruben Hassid you make it sound so easy lol

Let's to start it then only check how much effective it be

Absolutely - keeping your emotions in check isn't the same as suppressing them. That distinction tends to matter. Because a lot of people have learned to mask rather than regulate. And the team tends to feel the difference even when they can't quite name it.

Strong breakdown. This puts the pieces in plain English.

High IQ may get you in the room. High EQ is what makes people trust you, follow you, and want to work with you again. Most leadership problems are emotional intelligence problems in disguise.

Day 3 is the one most people will skip — and it's the only one that compounds. Days 4–7 automate your workflow. But without the context file built properly first, you get speed without coherence. You're automating a generic voice, not yours. The .md file isn't setup. It's the system design layer. Get that right and every subsequent day multiplies. Rush it and you've built a faster version of average.

Much clear w/o too many colors and "infography" style.

Most people fail with AI because they treat it like a search engine instead of an operating system for work. The real unlock happens when you build workflows, memory, context, and systems around it. ⚡

The part about making it easy for people to speak up is the one most leaders overlook. Technical skills get people in the room but emotional intelligence is what keeps the room together.

Well said, Katheline. Edge cases are where system design is actually tested, not on paper.

Day 4's Gmail connector feels a bit ambitious for stopping copy-pasting forever right out of the gate. That's a big leap.