Browse Comments — Clean (de-noised)
Close reading of the corpus at each pipeline stage: raw → clean → relevant → coded.
117
comments matched
· page 6 of 6
Amina Nunn looking for partners to promote The Second World Digital Strike on February 24 of The Imagine project
Yuva Raju Nadimpalle looking for partners to promote The Second World Digital Strike on February 24 of The Imagine project
AI4IT Services LLC looking for partners to promote The Second World Digital Strike on February 24 of The Imagine project
Marcus O'Dell looking for partners to promote The Second World Digital Strike on February 24 of The Imagine project
Ezio v.s Santos looking for partners to promote The Second World Digital Strike on February 24 of The Imagine project
Virtual Solutions India looking for partners to promote The Second World Digital Strike on February 24 of The Imagine project
Old Sport Dispatch 請自行將事務驗證資料傳遞給我! 此外我只接受現實見面洽談
Really interesting angle. For me, the big shift is not just that AI makes research faster. It lowers the threshold for exploring ideas you might otherwise leave untouched because they feel too unclear, too time-consuming or too uncertain. But that only works if you can frame the question well. That is actually why I built Promptivity.dk: It is a free tool that helps turn a rough thought into a clearer prompt before using ChatGPT. Not because prompts are the goal but because better questions usually lead to better exploration.
The ideas that felt too unexpected or too ambitious to pursue weren't bad ideas — they were ideas the cognitive cost of exploration made impractical. AI removing that cost changes which questions are worth asking.
劉晉丞 Everything is already done, for you it'll take 2(3) clicks to stop all the wars: 1. Subscribe to The Imagine project X account now 2. Support The Digital Strike on February 24 *3(optional). Share to speed up the end of 'wars era' P.S. We only need a support of 51% of humanity to make it work.
"What Terence Tao is describing isn't AI doing the mathematics; it's AI handling enough of the surrounding work that the researcher can stay in the problem longer. That distinction matters. Augmentation at that level looks very different from automation, and it's probably where AI creates the most durable value: not replacing the expert, but extending how long they can operate at full capacity."
Reducing cognitive friction" is the perfect way to put it. It’s not about AI finding the answers for us, but giving us the mental bandwidth to ask bigger, more ambitious questions
The real shift here isn’t speed, it’s expansion of search space under preserved reasoning traces. If AI reliably reduces low-level cognitive load while keeping derivation paths intact, research stops being constrained by human throughput and becomes constrained by idea selection and verification quality.
The idea of AI preserving and documenting the reasoning paths behind discovery is especially compelling for both research transparency and knowledge transfer
Marcus O'Dell Do you think AI’s greatest impact on scientific research will come from increasing productivity, or from enabling entirely new lines of inquiry that were previously impractical to pursue?
Isn't it time we moved to the next level?
AI can unlock bolder research paths and make discovery more accessible.