Browse Comments — Raw (as collected)
Close reading of the corpus at each pipeline stage: raw → clean → relevant → coded.
218
comments matched
· page 6 of 11
Álvaro Criado
His words seem impressively in line with what we can realize when we read the SpaceX filing.
Taking energy directly from the Sun to fuel AI feels self-serving, something useful exclusively for the company to raise money, but not for people. AI is an amazing thing as long as it's supportive and improves our lives, but it's not mandatory in everyone's life.
Nevertheless, it looks like we will need other planets to live and we're already not able to produce enough energy. And for what, exactly?
This is true, but also there is a greater good at the end of the tunnel. Ai is just in its infancy. What we see now is not what Ai will look like in 3 to 5 to 20 years. Great time to be alive to watch it all unfold Pascal BORNET
Bingo, thnx for sharing
Does rarely = sometimes?
That certainly is an important question. Do you feel the questions posed by the vid are importanr as well?
Isn’t that kinda what is being said in the vid?
Do you feel the vid is not including that in its perspective?
I agree that governance is vital in battling what the vid is highlighting.
Q - for those which seem outside the reach of governance, what else can help move toward broad fairness?
The uncomfortable question may be even deeper: who is really directing AI right now?
We can point to founders, investors, governments and big tech leaders, and they clearly influence the direction through capital, infrastructure, regulation and talent.
But as AI systems become more capable, the question is not only whether humans can manipulate AI. It is also whether AI will start shaping human decisions, incentives and institutions in ways we don’t fully understand yet.
So yes, ownership and governance matter. But maybe the real debate is not only “who benefits from AI?”
It is also: who, or what, will ultimately be steering the system?
Maybe and maybe not. The increasing accessibility is typically also be part of the strategy…some food for thought.
Very interesting. Leads me to the question of ‘how does one govern intelligence?’
I’m not saying it can’t be done, just curious what your answer thoughts are on that.
Bernie Saunders was made for YUYAY but has not had it explained to him. If only there was a writer who understood YUYAY then he would get it in a flash.
What wasn't shown in the movie-clips, that the wolrd was completely destroyed and just a single robot is cleaning up the mess ... created by mankind, maybe that's more of the path we're heading for right now.
The biggest AI conversation was never just about intelligence
So true Pascal BORNET
We must build a sustainable #future that uplifts every single worker.
Die gleiche Frage hat man sich vor 50 Jahren gestellt, als es um die gute oder böse Atomkraft ging. Es kommt immer darauf an, wer die Antworten liefert.
The integration of parametric design tools into facade workflows shifts focus from mere shape generation to the optimization of environmental performance. We must consider how these automated systems dictate energy outcomes for future envelopes.
Applying this logic to the building envelope, we must ensure that automation in design and QC processes serves the technical integrity of the assembly rather than just accelerating project delivery.
Absolutely! That sums it up all.