Browse Comments — Clean (de-noised)

Ravi Samrat Mishra Brain health is one of the greatest investments we can make for our future. Small daily habits like movement, learning, rest, and managing stress shape not only our focus and memory, but also our emotional resilience and quality of life. 🧠✨

Came up with this same script idea years ago, but the tech founder commentary definitely gives it more punch to get the point across. Ran on the treadmill yesterday and generated 150 Watts, and couldn't help thinking that we should actually capture that...

Google chose interesting strategy when upgrading from 1.0 to 2.0. the interface changed completely and original interface moved to a separate app which needed to be downloaded (antigravity ide). It would have been less jarring to ease user into new interface.

This is quite rich content but still seems quite sophisticated for people with no coding background. Hence the real B2C market will skyrocket through vibe coding Is there a skills.md file already incorporating these for Claude? ☺️

Junk in, Junk out! Control the noise and ensure the mind is receiving the signal. Thank you for sharing.

The moat people underestimate is institutional knowledge. You can RAG over a knowledge base but the actual edge cases, the "we tried that in 2019 and here's why it broke", the undocumented exceptions that senior folks just know, that stuff isn't written down anywhere. It lives in people's heads.

"Foothills of the singularity" is a statement about relative position, not absolute pace. It's saying the curve is still steepening. CodeMender is the most consequential announcement here — not because the capability is new, but because of what it forces organizations to answer. Who authorizes an AI to modify production code autonomously? Under what constraints? With what rollback protocol? What evidence trail exists when something breaks? The technical problem is mostly solved. The authorization architecture is barely articulated. If we're at the foothills, companies building AI governance today are building it for a world that will look very different halfway up the slope. That's not a reason to wait. It's a reason to build flexibility into the governance layer now, before the slope gets steep enough that you don't have time to rethink it.

LeVinh Nguyen Exactly. We pretend to teach and they pretend to learn. Performative "education". With new assessments, however, this could change.

Thanks for sharing! CFBR

And when I want to check my codebase, it says, "Sorry, I cannot fulfill your request to review the code to detect and fix potential security issues or perform a vulnerability analysis on the project." Google Antigravity And how i must use your product as a great agent for my code?

Yeah, sure. lol

WAKEUP ....THIS WAS A PROJECT FOR THE INNOCENT OF THE CHOSEN ONES.

A lot of students weren't really reading the books anyway. AI has revealed a structural issue from education's Pandora's Box. We can either try to stuff it back in there (good luck), or work towards system-wide structural change to ensure effective learning and critical thinking is taking place.

This is just an interim step to the Matrix.

(sadly, the article is behind a paywall, so I don't know what it says... but I happen to be taking a break from grading essays to scan linkedin to remind myself of other things I could be doing right now lol). It's a sad state of affairs. I think about how the students of today will possess degrees but none of the actual knowledge and skills that those degrees represent. It isn't all of them, thankfully. There are some students in my classes who take a stance against using AI. They see it as harmful to the environment or just think it's wrong. For those few, I carry on trying to do my job. For me, the saddest part is that those that are choosing to shortcut and outsource the difficulty of learning are doing themselves a great disservice. I wish I could convince each one of my students (and all of their parents and caregivers who are guilty of pushing them to get good grades) that the grades ultimately mean nothing. It's what they actually learn that matters. Anyway, I just hope they figure it out before they have to run the planet.

The spin class economy is more plausible than I'm comfortable admitting. But the real question buried here — what should humans remain responsible for, not just capable of — is the one most AI strategies haven't answered yet. Replacing tasks is easy to measure. Redesigning participation is not.

Interesting perspective.But I believe humans are fundamentally wired for growth, contribution, and creation, not just consumption or comfort. We invented AI because we constantly push beyond our current limits. AI is automating tasks, but it does not replace human ambition, curiosity, or meaning. The real future is not AI replacing humans. It’s humans becoming more capable through collaboration with AI.

Brain health is honestly built through small daily habits repeated consistently over time. Good sleep, movement, nutrition, and mental peace probably impact long-term performance more than people realize.

We talk so much about strategy, but everything stems from how cleanly we manage our daily mental baseline. Having a visual reminder to audit these behavioral states is incredibly useful. Great share!

This is just another example of an academic who does not understand the role of AI in education. Sad that this comes from one of UK's top universities. Really, university academics must be re-trained in their future role at academia if they hope to stay relevant.