Browse Comments — Raw (as collected)

Did they fix the caching and server issues? Has anyone actually switched from full claude code and/or codex usage as their daily to Antigravity? Anytime I used 3.5 it was constant server interrupts and losing the thread.

Coming from a completely different subject area, I agree. My perspective is that AI-proof assessments are urgently needed in order to de-incentivise using AI the rest of the time; it’s genuinely ruinous for education.

I think part of this discussion may be focusing too narrowly on assessment methods. In reality, we already have many alternative approaches available: oral exams, pen-and-paper assessments, practical activities, project-based work, and many others. We can certainly continue designing new assessment strategies adapted to the AI era. At the same time, teachers themselves can also benefit from AI to support assessment, feedback generation, and learning analytics. For this reason, I believe we indeed need to rethink teaching, learning, and assessment processes more deeply, but I also see many opportunities to achieve positive outcomes. My main concern, however, is not assessment itself. The real challenge is how we teach and support students so they can use AI effectively, critically, ethically and responsibly to achieve the best possible results in their work and learning processes.

There are still a lot of bugs to work out here. AntiGravity + Jules is the best combination if you want actual automation and 24x7 operation. I have no idea where the 93 sub agents figure came from...marketing spiel?I currently have a project in development with 120 +/- agentic processes, but none of them have anything to do with AG.

If this is anything like how they said "Free" for Flash Preview when they launched Gemma 4... no thank you. I don't want my whole stack to break when they decide you need to add a billing credit card to my app with a required api key that is completely reliant and built by the higher end models. Hard pass.

Sheshadri Bhattacharyya Care to share any examples?

Aizaz Ahmad Altaf Engr. Irshad Ahmed

Idea is good, but it seems it is not there yet.

Do the math on ROI as well, when you get a chance.

"Built on Gemini, our code security agent automatically finds and fixes critical software vulnerabilities." Can you get the "finding" part and replace the "automatically ... fixes" part with "tells you the details of the problem and what *it* would to do fix it", so that you can see whether this is a problem for which that point fix is correct or whether it reveals other code issues that it missed?

"Though the AI-assisted test-takers had a higher solve rate than the control group for most of the experiment" - that's what a technology is for isn't it? If it can't solve it you fall back on yourself!

So, it's a factory of a lot of SLM's?

Robert Hutchinson The difference is people are now offloading both their thinking and reading, where before it was just their reading. People are losing the skills of critical thinking and the ability to construct an argument because they're not actively engaging in it.

I saw an update, but it did not look so powerful.

Crispin Courtenay we talk about real usage limits. Probably you missed my comment with the link to discussion on the google(dot)dev, how current limits are blocking Pro/Ultra users from using it.

Adrian Scandrett my thoughts exactly. There should be multiple formative presetation as well as viva, plus summative viva.

https://worldvipnet.com/princely-foundation/the-system-of-consciousness-overview-and-objectives.html

The solution is obvious just award degrees based on final written exams

Or you could use AI to help you think for yourself again. brainscroll.pro

AI can write more code now. That part is changing fast. But the real edge was never just typing code. The real edge is knowing what should exist, why it should exist, how the pieces connect, what problem is worth solving, and what the end product should become. AI can execute a vision. It still needs someone with the vision.