Browse Comments — Clean (de-noised)

And quota ends within 2 hours

The shift from writing code to directing intelligence was always inevitable — most just didn’t see it coming this fast.

Not there yet. Google is more hype and marketing than real world usability

Max Bornehed

Paolo Spada did you see this: I thought this concept of the AI favouring the never-skilling was interesting in the wider context of the use of AI by HE students combined for example with the approach of Sweden that is reverting to learning materials in paper (rather than digital), at least in schools

Where we’re going we won’t need brains 😎 No C-level exec at Microsoft has brains. 🤷🏻‍♂️

If someone ever builds a gym like that, that pays you to train there, I’m sure it would be very popular.

Pure Matrix

The best engineers of the next decade will not be the fastest typists. They will be the best orchestrators, and that race just got a lot more interesting.

“Just the beginning” See THE HEROES AGENTIC AI I’ve been part of this journey for the last two decades. At first, we called it signal processing. Then statistical learning. Then machine learning. Then deep learning. Then transformers. Now everyone talks about models, LLMs, and SLMs. But in reality, it has always been part of the same evolution of AI. Today’s AI models will evolve into something else tomorrow, just like every generation before them. AI is not a trend that disappears. It’s a long-term technological shift that will continue evolving for decades. And honestly, we are still only at the beginning!

That giving me some Matrix vibes 📟

What stood out to me from Google I/O wasn’t just the 93 agents part. It’s the shift from coding manually to managing systems of agents and workflows. Now the bottleneck is orchestration. The challenge isn’t generating code, but designing good context, coordination, and decision flow between agents.

Junot Nkulu making them capable of being more dumber. I've seen GenZ using ChatGPT for travel information with manned information desks meters away from them. Just come & say Hello 👋🤗, But No.. GenZ isn't listening with thier headphones on diving 🤿 deep into their 6inch screens, and when things go wrong they look for someone to blame. Almost comical when I see that happen

Paolo Spada an ‘oral defence’ of the submitted work should expose that i.e. a one-on-one discussion between lecturer and student where the student is asked to take the lecturer through the submitted work, explain its content and answer the lecturer’s questions. The outcome thereof can then be used to allocate a fair mark for the submitted work.

their app dont even work

Let's not forget this

Thank you for writing this so honestly, Paolo. The 'raised the floor' line is the one I keep sitting with. The layer I'd add. We have spent two years asking 'did AI write this?' The harder question is the one you are already moving toward. What can this student actually do that they could not do before? When the answer to that has to show up live, in a draft we watch grow, in a defense, in a problem we put in front of them, the detection question quietly retires. Looking forward to what your department settles on.

This reminds me of a black mirror episode

I knew it

Great information will have to give this a try