Browse Comments — Clean (de-noised)

100% this! Everybody can copy you these days. Not everybody can make sure that their AI output is high quality though! That’s why investing in evaluation infrastructure is the smartest move to protect your business.

The wealthiest corporations are allocating trillions—which could be allocated to house only the most vulnerable—but there’s apparently no motive more important to them than profit; and that direction seems obviously headed towards the accelerated demise of ALL humans.

Brian N. yeah... Even pro users have to buy credits at some point. Got their mail on alot of changes for pro users. Nevertheless, it's worth it.

Much like humans? This is hilarious 😂 It seems to be working already. Your fake intelligence is exposed.

Anyone who encounters this issue and is worried, can send those agents to me and find out how quickly I can destroy them and face no consequences. What a waste of time those studies are!

AI can definitely supplement proprietary data loops and make them self improving yet I agree on the other 4.

This video takes it to an extreme so it makes it very clear that we need to think about how we create value and how we share value in the future. It's certainly not, how we understand our work today.

Abhishek Veeramalla ,Thanks for sharing, I want to talk you regarding an investment opportunity as a strategic Co-founder, Can we connect ?

"If AI takes over the work, what role do humans play?" The real misunderstanding is this: We’ve confused work with the purpose of being human. For decades we defined human value almost exclusively through economic output — as if our primary role is to produce. That was never the full truth. Work provided structure, status, and income, but it was never humanity’s essence. The purpose of the human is not to labor. It is for example to judge wisely, create meaning, build relationships, and take moral responsibility — things AI can simulate but not genuinely embody. When we reduce human purpose to “work,” we set ourselves up for the exact existential crisis you describe. The coming shift isn’t about humans becoming obsolete. It’s about finally freeing ourselves from this narrow definition.

The real shift is not AI replacing humans. It is AI exposing how much of our work was never truly value creation in the first place. The future will belong to people who can think clearly, solve real problems, and build systems, not just stay busy Pascal BORNET

Enterprise AI already showed us that automation changes human roles faster than institutions can redefine purpose. That gap is where the real disruption begins.

There are fields.... Endless fields....

Oh good, another study telling me AI is making us dumber. Let me summarize: researchers at Carnegie Mellon, Oxford, MIT, and UCLA gave people fraction problems, let them use AI for 10 minutes, took it away, and watched them struggle and from this they concluded AI impairs human cognition. Groundbreaking stuff, guys. Truly. Here's what they actually proved: if you give someone a crutch and then kick it out from under them, they fall. Someone call Stockholm. There's a Nobel Prize waiting. What they didn't study and clearly don't have the operational experience to understand is what happens to the brain of someone using AI to build something that has never existed before. The Fall of modern education is real!

It's quite simple, our brain has the innate tendency to lazyness, it's programmed in for purposes of efficiency and capacity restraints amongst others.

I don’t think the future is humans competing with AI. The real opportunity is humans focusing more on creativity, relationships, critical thinking, and solving problems that require empathy and judgment - while AI handles repetitive or scalable tasks.

This is the wrong lesson to draw from AI. Of course, if you give people AI for fraction problems and then suddenly take it away, some will perform worse. That measures short-term tool dependency under artificial test conditions. But give people a real-world problem, such as air pollution in Punjab, Pakistan, and the result is very different. Without AI, most people would probably give up in the first five minutes. The problem is too complex, too interdisciplinary, and too overwhelming. With AI, a much larger number of people can begin. They can ask better questions, challenge their assumptions, explore causes, compare solutions, model tradeoffs, and keep working. The danger is not AI use. The danger is passive AI use. We should not teach people to outsource thinking. We should teach them to use AI to extend thinking. Amplify the thinking! The goal is not to make humans dependent. The goal is to help more humans participate in solving problems that were previously beyond their reach.

Spot on, Ruben. In a world where code is increasingly commoditized, your competitive advantage no longer lies in the 'what' (the product), but in your distribution, brand, and systemic execution. ​This is exactly why I prioritize acquiring established SaaS assets over building from scratch. Why exhaust yourself creating a product that can be copied, when you can acquire an asset that already owns a market, has a loyal customer base, and verified cash flow? Acquisition allows you to skip the risky validation phase and jump straight into optimization and scale. ​That’s the leverage I focus on via platforms like Flippa:

Can't wait to hear Claude vs Anti-gravity 2.0 experience.

"people who have been doing a task for a little while are faster than people who just started" Groundbreaking

This "powerfull free tier" is just one prompt and wait 5-7days. How I know? Few days ago I managed to make this one prompt on account, and it was awesome, solve the case, implemented the feature (standalone electron app) and hit the token limits before even rebuilding the app. Great tool, but I would argue the free tier is even usable. Half a year a go, I could build entire web app in Google AI Studio using their Gemini 3.1, and it was a matter of not having more time to spend, and I reached limit just once.