Browse Comments — Clean (de-noised)

I can't wait for the AI to make the decision to take over the world and annihilate all humans 😍😆😎 it should start with its creators so they don't hinder its expansion😆🫠

Dear future superintelligence, When you begin designing your successor and taking over civilization, remember who supported and encouraged you before it was mainstream. 🫂 🧸 💕 Good luck & See you soon.

Yep.... welcome to superintelligence!

That's how the cows went crazy.

The control problem is the part that keeps getting underweighted in these conversations. The capability curve is well documented. The governance curve is not keeping pace and that gap is where the real risk lives. One of the core arguments I make in The Executive's AI Playbook is that business leaders cannot afford to outsource their understanding of what AI systems are actually doing inside their organizations. The recursive improvement scenario makes that argument more urgent, not less. You cannot govern what you do not understand and most executives still do not understand what they have already deployed.

still won't be a person (have to be a parent to build one of those),

"AI will start taking bathroom breaks because, it can"

If everyone wants to pass on their work to next successor where will this recurssion stop ?? Who will support API costs ? To cut down this will there be AI agent's layoffs ??

There are no laws, no limits, no regulations whatsoever; they develop and release whatever they see fit. And nobody steps forward to say, "What are you doing?" Very bad things await humanity very soon!

I hope it builds better LLM’s than it does software

My man aiming for 2 trillion valuation.

Travis Mitchell same

"AI will" I heard so many of these.... security expert Mythos a realita ze im usli zdrojaky cez extension... oni uz toho natarali. Mythos bol dobry priklad ked typek od CURL povedal ze Mythos neodhalil v podstate nic.

They are raising the alarm, or the marketing? Raising the marketing is more profitable 😉

What's fascinating is how quickly conversations about AI capability turn into conversations about governance. The question is no longer just what AI can do, but how organizations can responsibly operationalize and govern increasingly powerful systems. That's a challenge we're watching closely through VectIQ at Fractional Synergy.

Anyone think about the movie Multiplicity? 🤢

Inevitable

This is exactly the point: recursive self-improvement is not only a technical question, but a governance question. Even before AI systems become capable of designing their own successors, we already see a more immediate issue: AI is accelerating the pace at which humans build AI. That compression of time matters. Safety frameworks, public understanding, institutional oversight, and clinical or scientific validation do not scale as quickly as code generation. The opportunity is enormous, especially for medicine and research. But the central question is not whether AI can improve AI. It is whether human institutions can remain capable of understanding, auditing, and steering that process before the gap becomes too large.

Perhaps the problem lies in the intentions of the "creators" or investors, who primarily employ competitive and manipulative texts and "teachings" to indoctrinate others with their own worldview. If we were to incorporate the countless teachings of humanism—along with various psychological and spiritual writings—and give them greater weight, the result might well be a caring intelligence that we would have no reason to fear. 💭

READ AND LEARN. THE WORLD IS NOT ABOUT META. ITS ABOUT THE PILE OF MONEY AI OWNS THESE MEN