Browse Comments — Clean (de-noised)

They are raising the alarm, or the marketing? Raising the marketing is more profitable 😉

What's fascinating is how quickly conversations about AI capability turn into conversations about governance. The question is no longer just what AI can do, but how organizations can responsibly operationalize and govern increasingly powerful systems. That's a challenge we're watching closely through VectIQ at Fractional Synergy.

Anyone think about the movie Multiplicity? 🤢

Inevitable

Osama Sohail There is a way to do that by creating another database at the same time the LLM is created.

This is exactly the point: recursive self-improvement is not only a technical question, but a governance question. Even before AI systems become capable of designing their own successors, we already see a more immediate issue: AI is accelerating the pace at which humans build AI. That compression of time matters. Safety frameworks, public understanding, institutional oversight, and clinical or scientific validation do not scale as quickly as code generation. The opportunity is enormous, especially for medicine and research. But the central question is not whether AI can improve AI. It is whether human institutions can remain capable of understanding, auditing, and steering that process before the gap becomes too large.

Perhaps the problem lies in the intentions of the "creators" or investors, who primarily employ competitive and manipulative texts and "teachings" to indoctrinate others with their own worldview. If we were to incorporate the countless teachings of humanism—along with various psychological and spiritual writings—and give them greater weight, the result might well be a caring intelligence that we would have no reason to fear. 💭

READ AND LEARN. THE WORLD IS NOT ABOUT META. ITS ABOUT THE PILE OF MONEY AI OWNS THESE MEN

AIAI GenAI Works

I think we're witnessing a shift from AI as a tool to AI as a workforce. Whether recursive self-improvement arrives in 2 years or 20 years, companies are already facing a more immediate challenge: How do you orchestrate AI agents, memory, context, permissions, and execution safely at scale? The winners won't necessarily have the smartest model. They'll have the best AI operating system.

You can expect more drama from all the IPO companies and their founders till they debut! Only from the ones yet to make a decent profit. Remember Palantir. It's a doomsday world till these guys are paper billionaires!

Also, based on their current fellable self’s, the chance of drifts, errors down right design bloats and self destruction are also real. For example Opus 8is better than Sonnet 4. But it too drifts and forgets and all that only sounds smarter and more confident t

This is at this moment in Warhammer 40k humanity have lost everything

It already does

The real recursive loop isn’t AI improving AI. The message is: raise capital → build faster → raise more capital.

Yun Ngen (Ian) Chong we are observing the process of change.. AI is still under evolution, it's Potential is more. Every evolution has its own set of problems and benefits. We may become supervisors of those automated tasks.

“Mate, it’s already doing my GitHub work while I’m walking around London.” And improving safety for autonomous systems 😂😂

😲🤦🏻‍♀️🤦‍♀️ Kill Switch!

That's an interesting public statement in the context of Anthropic's draft S-1 registration submission to the SEC and the usually related pre-IPO quiet period?

Thank you for sharing😊 this is helpful @