Browse Comments — Clean (de-noised)

"The proactive thrive. The passive get displaced." Since when this is a new trend ? With AI or without AI. It was not always like this ? It has always been like this. It’s a fundamental law of economic history.

Aproveite a fama e os ganhos indevidos em cima do meu intelecto e minha ADhara Lyra mas Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) FBI Cyber Division FBI-LEEDA vai adorar entrar no meu sistema operacional que roubaram e pegar tudo que está marcado como prova de cada invasão, roubo, desvios e lavagem de dinheiro. Aproveitem o ganho exponencial de fundos que não ganhavam a anos antes de minha biotecnologia e intelecto. Coencidencia mesmo e ele ter começados a crescer depois que começaram me roubar, estauquiar, invadir e monitorar de forma criminosa. Seja interessante ver meu selo de propriedade intelectual que criei e anexei ao serne para trancar no meu código. Ele ele e o mesmo que tranca o $1300.000.000.000 que tentaram me roubar quando inseriram minha biotecnologia de forma fraudulenta e o mesmo que tentaram justificar com o cargo de diretora Global R10 L10 o mesmo que tentaram devias salários, bônus. e o mesmo selo bloqueou . Será interessante saber como estam justificando a falta de pagamento para uma Diretoria executiva que vocês mesmo não entregaram os acessos para agora em meu nome. lavagem de dinheiro, falsificação de assinatura, usurpação de funções e prevalicacao de poder.

It feels like the AI world is starting to repeat the 1990s race over who had the better phone. Back then it was Nokia vs. Siemens. Today it’s Claude vs. ChatGPT vs. Gemini vs. another dozen tools. The result? Fragmented attention, more subscriptions, and countless hours spent experimenting. Don’t get me wrong experimentation is important. But I get the feeling that 90% of people are still just trying new tools, comparing outputs, and jumping between platforms without actually building much of anything. Meanwhile, we’re constantly fed stories about AI agents running entire companies from a Mac Mini. Sounds great. Reality is usually far less exciting. In the end, I don’t think it matters that much which tool you use. What matters is how you use it. And whether there’s still some common sense sitting between the keyboard and the screen.

There’s definitely something in this. I don’t think ChatGPT is suddenly dead, but I do think people are getting tired of jumping between ten different tools just to finish one piece of work. The winner won’t just be the smartest model. It’ll be the setup that makes the whole workflow feel less broken.

Mehran Shovkati that's a fair point. AI gives you the answer. SO forced you to understand the context around it. Both have a place — but they're not doing the same job.

Valentin P. 😄 mutant is the right word. Data didn't just grow — it shapeshifted. And most pipelines weren't built for what it became.

Zachary H. honestly, SO's toxicity problem was a slow self-inflicted wound. AI didn't kill the community — the community made it easy to leave

Damian Szczerba 😄 the turtle training on Splinter's own moves — that's actually a sharp way to frame it. AI grew up on SO's knowledge and now SO is the one struggling to stay relevant.

Tyrone Muhammad, BSDA exactly. SO was built for a time when finding the right answer required patience. AI removed that friction. The switch wasn't a betrayal — it was just inevitable.

Aravind S D The AI slop pushback is real and growing. If output quality drops enough, there will be a correction. But I doubt it brings people back to SO — more likely it just raises the bar for how people use AI.

more tokens for us :)

Utkarsh Maurya Utkarsh Maurya nailed it. The feedback loop matters — less public knowledge shared, weaker future models on edge cases. We might not notice for 2-3 years. Then suddenly the gaps show.

George Coller M.S. I'm glad you've found where your abilities complement the AI system. Many are still struggling with this!

kinda like how CAD tools shifted architects from drafting every line to really exploring forms, AI lets researchers skip routine stuff and dive deeper into new ideas.

No comment.....

Stack overflow is no longer relevant. Remember the time humans transitioned from machine language to programming? Now we are transitioning from programming to ai tools. Programming languages are irrelevant now. They will slowly become obsolete. Now skills are measured by how learnt you are in claude, cursor, chatgpt etc. If you are still coding the traditional way or even debugging the traditional way, you are going backwards. AI should code and debug for you henceforth.

Sometimes the logs in third-party libraries are so cryptic that I don't think we need to worry about losing our debugging skills anytime soon! And that Stack Overflow nostalgia... Oh:)

Very good reflection. During my first experiences using AI for software development, I quickly realized that although I was producing code faster, I was not really learning. That’s when I decided that for every new project using a framework I don’t know, I would build a complete progressive workflow — from beginner to professional. The project evolves from a beginner version to a professional one by following clear stages that I test at every level. I do not focus only on the code itself, but on understanding the logic behind how the entire project works. During these progressive checkpoints, I continuously update the workflow with best practices, solutions to bugs encountered, and lessons learned along the way. At the end of the project, I create a second, professional-grade workflow for future projects. The first serves as educational material, while the second becomes a production-ready process for similar projects. If you have other approaches that you use, please share them with me — I’m always interested in learning different ways of working and improving my process.

“STACK”

Wowwwwww