Browse Comments — Raw (as collected)

There's a man who wants more power than the value of what he produces.

Someone will lead in AI. It might not always be us, but for now, we lead.

Thomas Smet Great foresight! Building infrastructure at that massive scale is definitely not a charity act. At the end of the day, those trillions will demand an ROI, and the cost of our convenience will inevitably go up.

thom nickels It is very hard to deal with when the Pope rarely speaks of Jesus. At one point he mentioned the President more than 10 times and never mentioned God or Jesus. When the President sent missles into Africa to protect Catholic martyrs, the Pope is meeting former Obama people on the mid terms

Most likely someone else mentioned this, here it goes anyways : https://youtu.be/IojqOMWTgv8

Feel terrible for all these young people who have worked hard to get their degrees and in certain countries borrowed money to do so only to learn the reward (a job providing a living wage) is no longer in sight. I can appreciate it when they say they have been misled.

Important perspective. The conversation around AI is no longer just about capability. It's also about values, responsibility and the kind of future we want to build alongside these technologies.

Md Rakib Hasan as discussed previouly and we need to pivot accordingly or become irrelevant eventully after the hype bubble?

Again I assume you are woke with the untrue response. Catholics ran an Underground Railroad to get Jews out through Italy. More Catholics may have been killed in concentration camps than Jews. when the head of Auswitz was facing death he requested a priest but they has to get one from another country as the Germans killed all the priests in Poland. That is some wine and dinning. Does it make you feel important making things up?

The Pope LIED to Catholics about the Latin Mass. The Pope stated the majority of Bishop were against the Latin Mass. Leaked documents showed exactly the opposite, the majority were in favor of it. https://www.catholicworldreport.com/2025/07/03/vatican-downplays-leaked-documents-on-latin-mass/

From the Chicago Sun Times: The Allegations: Survivor-advocacy groups like SNAP (Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests) released internal Vatican documents and recordings alleging that before his papacy, as Bishop Robert Prevost of Chiclayo, Pope Leo XIV mishandled, suppressed, or failed to thoroughly investigate local child abuse claims https://snapnetwork.org/2025/12/08/pope-leo-helped-shield-clergy-accused-of-abuse-in-peru-abuse-survivors-allege/

The models are getting faster and smarter, but SynthID might be the most important announcement here, because trust doesn’t scale as quickly as technology.

Mark Brezinski MD,PhD,CPT sure, you are right. CatGPT gives a lot of rubbish replies, but here you are Human to choose. Often it takes up to 5 times with a very detailed description just to get something close, but sometimes it works

Jennifer Lowder There is a better way than LLMs and a better way overall. https://universal-natural-intelligence-prec.vercel.app/about.html

George Shmelin So I am a technology person. Built technology you would know most of my adult life, technology committees from the NIH, DOe< DOD, etc. I was actually asked by the Chinese government to build gyroscopes for their fighter planes which I didn’t (though a saved the email and PDF). I see the misuse of MRIs/CTs leading to bad patient outcomes all the time. What smart phones have done to society. Technology is only a tool which needs to be used with caution. But this has been said by many people, including including Drucker and Buffett.

Annalie Killian this may be of interest to you...

A very valid point to consider while developing the AI governance framework.

The interesting question isn't whether the Pope is right or wrong. Most people already agree that AI should serve humanity. The hard problem is operational: how do we build systems that preserve human dignity when economic incentives, geopolitical competition, and institutional self-interest all push in different directions? The challenge is not defining values. The challenge is creating governance structures that remain aligned when those values become expensive. There is an even deeper observation: Nearly everyone in the thread assumes the problem is values. The harder problem is interpretation. Nobody says: "I oppose human dignity." Everyone says they support: dignity, justice, freedom, truth, accountability. The disagreement starts when those words must be operationalized. That's why governance is difficult. The battle is rarely over values. The battle is over what those values mean in practice. That is the most interesting thing in the thread, and almost nobody is talking about it.

Matthew Kilkenny This really resonates. What stands out to me is how much of this plays out through attention. If AI is becoming invisible moral infrastructure, then it is also shaping what we notice, what we value, and what we give our attention to over time. In an always-on environment, that influence becomes continuous. Attention is being guided long before we consciously reflect on it. So the question may not only be what AI is doing to the human spirit, but whether we understand attention well enough to protect it. Because that is where experience, judgment, and meaning are actually formed in real time. - James

I agree. Most students are not trying to break the rules, they are trying to navigate a system that often hasn't defined them clearly. The question is no longer whether AI should be used in higher education. Students are already using it. The real question is when, how, and for what purpose it should be used. Clear expectations, AI literacy, and assessment redesign are far more valuable than blanket bans. When institutions provide guidance instead of ambiguity, students can focus on learning rather than guessing where the boundaries are. The challenge isn't AI. It's governance, transparency, and intentional design.