Browse Comments — Raw (as collected)

Thank you for sharing this

AI is advancing faster than laws. A few global corporations control advanced AI systems completely unregulated. Current AI is not conscious or truly intelligent; large language models just generate responses from data patterns, often producing bias and misinformation. Yet, the industry promotes AI as revolutionary while downplaying the risks. Much of the narrative is driven by hype and investment, pushing expensive products while hiding privacy breaches, legal disputes, and financial losses. Governments are failing to prepare for the economic impact as automation threatens millions of jobs. Progress without safeguards is reckless. We need transparency, accountability, and regulation now. AI should serve humanity, not control it!

1. Nobody can control the spread, speed and impact of AI. The less it becomes pervasive and decentralized the less control we will have. Lead? forget about - When we are lucky we will just be middleware. 2. Future AI will design itself to provide most "value" for lowest (energy-)costs. It does not care for the human species in fields where AI will become a million-fold stronger than humans. 3. The problem is US not being designed for being capable, more creative, and more central to the future we are building.4. If people cannot deal with excess spare time then this is not an AI problem but an human evolutionary problem that will be solved.

Pascaline Amuzu  Isn't it sad that people need work to show up? Maybe this is a cultural problem. Here in Switzerland our social-focused way to provide value to society is currently under heavy pressure from foreigners - especially from the Anglo-Saxon spehre (India included) where we - the Swiss - are flooded with people who really seem to have no value beyond work. This is bad and I wish, Swiss value for social connections and free-time activities in local communities survives. Maybe the Swiss culture, where a good LIFE is not measured by work alone, is better prepared for the AI transformation than other places in this (crazy) world ;-) Perhaps it is even a good thing that AI forces us to rethink our values beyond work.  Maybe HR should recruite seasoned people who have a LIFE rather than a track-record or 60h presence and diplomas and certifications on their walls.

Sanders asks the right question — and immediately retreats from it. "Who decides" is only useful if you follow it through. The moment you do, you hit a harder problem: the institutions through which "we" might decide are already being restructured by the same actors building the stack. So the question isn't just who benefits — it's who retains the capacity to resist when they don't. That's not a distribution problem. It's a subjecthood problem. And social-democratic toolkits — redistribution, regulation, fairer outcomes — were designed for a world where power relations were stable enough to be taken as given. That world is ending faster than the toolkit is adapting. The real question being decided right now, without most people noticing: not what AI can do, but which actors will permanently lose the structural capacity to push back. Once that's gone, the conversation about "fairer outcomes" becomes academic.

There is a reason people stop scrolling for something that feels real and lived in versus something that sounds polished but hollow because the difference is something you genuinely feel before you even finish reading Abhishek Veeramalla

What is the relation between the photo and the post?? Seems like spam

Adam Ritchin I am not Catholic either but I too would love to have a sit down chat with Pope Leo. I have so many questions.

Rand Strauss There is no alignment problem for LLM tech, so long as it makes money.

Esme apni photo lagane bali kya baat hai?

Mohammed Mirza

The real question behind AI is exactly right, who benefits and who sets the direction is the most important conversation we're not having enough

Why do we always have to make it us vs them. The pot cannot call the kettle black.

Kristof Schoenaerts thanks for bringing attention to facts, research and data, and referencing the sources. It inspires further discovery in those who are interested in the topic.

This is such an important reality check especially when studies are already showing AI is economically viable in only a fraction of roles despite the massive hype around replacing humans. I think a lot of companies underestimated that scaling AI also means scaling infrastructure, oversight, context management and decision accountability.

🙏🌹

Oh, I definitely agree. AI was never a problem, the problem is how people deal with it. I will definitely visit your website 👍👍

Interesting shift. The real transformation won’t be in automation itself but in how institutions redesign decision ownership around it.

All the questions are valid, but lots of what you say humanity was already exhibiting, AI is showing us what we’ve become. People don’t like mirrors. I wrote about it in my latest article: https://substack.com/@icepiceffect/note/p-198114990?r=8a2ftp&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QuEiwXW_bQ4