Browse Comments — Clean (de-noised)
Close reading of the corpus at each pipeline stage: raw → clean → relevant → coded.
4.2K
comments matched
· page 151 of 210
Imagine a political system where everyone's voice could be heard and considerered every day? #everyvoicematters I hope that we can use AI for this purpose.
The line about ensuring the safety of agentic systems is the part that matters most here. CodeMender being tested by human experts before broad launch is the right pattern agents that find and fix vulnerabilities still need a human hand on the release. Capability and oversight scaling together.
Of course the tech ology and the companies that created it are the problem! Had they not built it the way they built it and advertised it and deployed it the way they did it would not be a problem. By your calculation, drugs and pushers aren't the problem either?
In the near future, someone might even become a professor without reading a book.
Good let them talk....TRUTH is on the line now.
AI is not doing anything to humans. Everything we have done, everything we are doing, everything we will do, we are doing to ourselves.
This really resonates with something I’ve been thinking about for a long time: AI isn’t just an intelligence race anymore, it’s becoming a trust race. The biggest challenge ahead may not be building more powerful models, but building systems that help humans validate, compare, and trust the outputs responsibly. Different AI systems already produce different answers, biases, and interpretations depending on the data, incentives, and framing behind them. That’s part of the philosophy behind ConsensusAI;not another standalone AI model, but a consensus and validation layer designed to compare multiple AI systems and identify the common thread, confidence level, and “Truth Index” between them. Ethical AI won’t come from blind trust in a single system.It will come from transparency, adjudication, accountability, and collective validation. The future probably belongs to AI systems that can explain not only what they concluded... but why multiple systems arrived there together.
Great, especially for the desiring to be- educated world!
I wish to be a particle of this great progress ! 😅 😅
100% - It’s all about the value system that the AIs are introduced into. The whole argument “AI will take over the when when AGI is reached” is nonsense. It’s smokescreen to cover up the fact that human greed and lust for power / SIN / is the real issue and those who wish to dominate humanity by enslaving them in a matrix like simulation - don’t want that discussion taking place.
Thanks for sharing the video Abhishek
Again I assume you are woke with the uneducated answer. Catholics ran an Underground Railroad to get Jews out through Italy. More Catholics may have been killed in concentration camps than Jews. when the head of Auswitz was facing death he requested a priest but they has to get one from another country as the Germans killed all the priests in Poland. That is some wine and dinning. Does it make you feel important making things up?
The unit economics angle is spot-on. We've seen the same pattern play out internally, where teams spun up Claude for everything in Q1, then got real about where it actually moved the needle by Q2. The infrastructure costs looked fine on a spreadsheet until you ran it at scale for six months straight. Totally agree that it's a tool multiplier for good engineering, not a replacement for thinking about the problem first.
Matthew Kilkenny What stands out to me is that this post recognizes something neuroscience and human behavior research have been quietly warning about for years: Humans do not merely use systems. Over time, humans adapt to systems... and systems begin shaping humans in return. That may become one of the defining human questions of the AI era.
A few mornings ago I came across a LinkedIn Post titled: The Vatican has just published a 245-paragraph document on artificial intelligence, just after I had posted my morning thoughts in a new article titled: When Creators Lose Control: What Creation Myths Teach Us About Artificial Intelligence. So after reading the Vatican publication I feed the document into my favorite AI tool and asked a question: "Since you are an AI system that I love to work with, do you see any value in this discussion that would make you want to operate differently?" I was surprised at the response since it speaks volumes about the company that created it. Here is the response: Part 1: Part 2:
Your babbling and I would bet the only thing you could teach is virtue signaling. But I will give you a chance to show your intellect with a few questions. So lets check your education. what started the civil war? In the number 1 ranked novel of all time by Proust, the first section is called Swan’s way for two reasons. what are they? What work did Milton Freedom win the Nobel Prize for what what did it change in economic thinking for good. What is Stephen Hawkins only significant contribution to physics. Einstein is credited for the general theory of relativity but someone finished it first, who. Who is the first internationally known African America artist and what work made it to the Salon in Paris? what is the difference between imaginary numbers in classical versus quantum physics? I read.
There is no evidence in looking at your background
Brooke D. This ENTIRE THREAD is demonstrating that these "caste systems" are structurally incapable of *responding to these allegations* because THEIR own professional SURVIVAL , PEDIGREES is TIED to the VERY INSTITUTIONS EXPOSED.
Good luck👏🏻
You just rambling, consider AI. You realize I can estimate and intelligence based on what people write