Browse Comments — Clean (de-noised)

I’m Jewish and I’d still love to meet Pope Leo.

What stood out to me most in this piece is the idea that the real challenge is not AI itself, but institutional ambiguity around what kinds of thinking, struggle, and cognitive engagement we are actually trying to preserve. That feels increasingly important. When institutions focus primarily on outputs without developing shared clarity around process, authorship, reflection, and demonstrated understanding, it becomes much harder to distinguish between genuine learning and the appearance of learning. I especially appreciated the point that some friction is actually the point. In many ways, the struggle to articulate, wrestle with uncertainty, and work through partial understanding is where meaningful learning often happens. Thought-provoking piece.

Gonna try it out is it in gartner

The Tanstack shoe app is a good resource. Thanks.

Thanks for sharing! I recently started one of the Columbia courses, will keep these as my reference for the assignments.

This is pretty much true of every for-profit company, and some non-profits, too. It's obviously true of oil companies, pharma, chemical/pesticide/herbicide companies, manufacturers, lumber, mining, etc. So much harm has been caused before regulation begins, and they continue to unleash powerful forces, allowing them to remain largely unrestrained. Nothing's changing. Certainly nothing's changing due to these comments.

every time I see these posts about how an AI tool can work on its own for hours and produce something great I have to laugh. In my experience, it always makes some very bad decisions and needs a lot of hand holding. If you car about the result, you have to provide a lot more than a one page input, just like human developers. AI is a great accelerator, but it still requires a lot of review from a human developer. They simply have no common sense

Everyone who cares needs to create a sovereign mesh intelligence network so that they dont find themselves confined in this shrodingers sickness.

As a non-Catholic: your new Pope continues to impress me.

Matthew, this is an important moment. AI is no longer just technical or regulatory. It is moral and spiritual. At Unshaken Voice Productions, ethical AI must be people-first, serving people, and accountable before God. Not profit over people. Not people as products. Not intelligence detached from conscience. Our foundation is Scripture alone. Human beings are made in God’s image. A machine may calculate, imitate, generate, and optimize, but it cannot bear God’s image, repent, worship, love sacrificially, discern sin, or answer before the Lord. That is why “alignment” is not enough until we ask: aligned to what truth, whose moral order, and what vision of humanity? The danger is not only that AI may become powerful. It is that humanity may surrender truth, conscience, responsibility, and moral imagination to tools built without fear of God or love of neighbor. But I am not hopeless. The Lord has always preserved a remnant and equipped His servants for each generation’s battles. The tools and kingdoms change, but the Lord does not. We must examine what AI can do, and what it is doing to the human spirit. Those building in this space must do so with humility, courage, and discernment. Technology is not Lord. Christ is.

$500 to $2,000 per engineer per month is not a lot of money, and at least in my case -- totally worth it.

zenodo.org/records/19067218

Stop debating and start creating is the real future. Debating creates "noise".

The most famous priest/bishop in the US takes a stand contrary to the Pope against the simplicity of open borders and stop demonizing the president.

I like Pope Leo but not his comments about AI.

Catholicism or Christianity can't speak to morality because both are frauds, just like other religions. The law of reality is PRECISELY AND ONLY, "Do only that, which would be acceptable to all," and you will not find this argument in any of the religious texts: that is, no religious text says that all laws and rules of the world ought to be replaced with a single law, "Do only that, which would be acceptable to all," by which all must live and be judged in the court of law. So, since each of the religions teaches something else, it follows that they are frauds, and hence, can't speak to morality. Here's a 2-prong proof that Jesus was a charlatan and hence Christianity is a fraud:

The Only True Proof of the Existence and Necessity of "God" Ever

Let’s science replace religion. His predecessors used to put scientists in jail or worse.

This is exactly what the AI space needed, Abhishek. Oracle just solved the biggest gap in AI education — the jump from tutorial to production. 🔥 After building AI-powered marketing workflows for real campaigns, I can tell you: theory doesn't move the needle. Production-ready apps with persistent memory, multi-agent orchestration, and actual deployment pipelines — that's what separates AI enthusiasts from AI practitioners. The agent-reasoning framework and finance-ai-agent-demo are gold. Anyone still learning from scattered tutorials needs to bookmark this immediately. Oracle just raised the bar. Appreciate you sharing this! 🚀 #AI #Oracle #MLOps #GenerativeAI #MultiAgentSystems #RAG #ArtificialIntelligence #DigitalTransformation #MachineLearning #AIOps #TechLeadership #OpenSource

Governance is not a checklist -- YES. It's like breathing. It is the process of a healthy society processing, talking about, playing with, sometimes restraining, sometimes unleashing, the countless wonderful things we people do, so we can all flourish together. The rigidity to the rules simply helps us sometimes enforce them or discuss them better. It is a means to an end, not an end in itself.