Browse Comments — Clean (de-noised)
Close reading of the corpus at each pipeline stage: raw → clean → relevant → coded.
4.2K
comments matched
· page 121 of 210
Most people want shortcuts, but good software still needs careful iteration.
This parallels what we see in surgery and rehabilitation. The outcome is rarely determined by one decision alone, but by consistent evaluation, adjustment, and attention to small details throughout the process.
AI helps move faster, but it does not replace careful thinking.
but it the same as everyone else is doing. but for sure far better than 99% of the general public. that's the problem.
This post explains why good prompting alone is not enough anymore.
Haider A. The difference really is the thinking part.
Stefano M. Sinicropi, MD absolutely 100%. It’s the clinicians work that makes the real difference.
Shivendrika s. Ultimately there are no shortcuts in life.
The real skill today is learning how to guide AI without losing context.
What Ayurveda was preaching since ages, now modern medicine is re casting with scientific terms
Great point. The current system already sees benefits concentrated amongst the few. Scaling this system would only accelerate the current imbalance. The work is to define value, before driving scale
The hard part was never typing code. It was always knowing what to build.
People expect magic from AI, but the real power comes from the workflow behind it.
The truth exists. Every religion has books full of truth and people who don’t actually apply it. The Sermon on the Mount is a systems lesson. Jesus focused far more on how people live than on institutional status. Whatever your tradition, leaders should be judged by the fruit they produce, not the titles they hold. If Pope Leo XIV keeps human dignity at the center of the AI debate, that’s a conversation worth having.
The autophagy and BDNF connections are where the most interesting research is heading. Good reminder that fasting isn't one-size-fits-all — context and guidance matter.
Current AI systems are more “cultivated” than “built,” for developers do not directly design every detail, but instead create a framework within which the intelligence “grows.
Clara thank you for putting back the church in the middle of the village - a French expression : remettre l’église au milieu du village. No one has indeed has had the time to carefully read the entire document, understand it and digest it. Obviously this is not written by the pope himself. I wonder who is behind this and for how long have they been working on such document to be published.
They had it coming
Philip Bell
I fundamentally believe that AI cannot drive the growth companies expect by removing human work force. However, it can definitely be a force multiplier for people and companies who learns to work with it. I think doing this will save more money for businesses than the tangible /Intangible benefits of replacing humans with AI and sharing some direct benefits companies will have. 1. Reduced OpEx because it makes teams 10x productive and efficient 2. More time/bandwidth/headspace for teams to focus on things where AI cannot be trusted or used. 3. Companies save money on rework due to human errors.