Browse Comments — Raw (as collected)

I think AI has the potential to be the most empowering, decentralising and democratising tool while at the same time posing an existential threat. As an optimistic alarmist I’m hopefully we can steer a future that does involve ‘disarming’ the risk of certain models and enabling the guardrails and usage systems to steer it it in the best direction for humanity. Naive maybe, but I think we still have the agency and this encyclical is a positive step forward

Brittany Vierra

Exactly right Jesse — security by design not security by afterthought. The immune system analogy is perfect. An AI system without it doesn’t just get sick — it gets compromised quietly, often without anyone noticing until the damage is done.

Magnifica Humanitas is not claiming “AI good” or “AI bad.” It is that technology is not morally neutral. Systems inherit the assumptions, incentives, and values of those who design, finance, regulate and deploy them. That matters enormously in education, work, and governance. To me the question remains---What kinds of human beings, institutions and societies are being formed inside increasingly intelligent systems? And who gets to shape the underlying moral architecture? The concentration question feels especially important. As technological capability scales, wealth, influence and governance capacity increasingly concentrate in relatively few transnational actors. That is not only a technical problem. It is a profoundly anthropological and political one. “Disarming AI” may be difficult. Perhaps the deeper challenge is disarming the logics of inevitability, concentration, and optimization that quietly shape the systems before most people even realize the architecture is being built.

Do you honestly think it naturally follows that the net result will be AI, robotics and automation replacing the need for human contribution and we'll have some immediate crisis of purpose? I'd be more afraid of the social engineers stepping in to proactively design a world of purpose. What could go wrong?

I've seen some top performers who struggle with EQ but still excel through expertise or drive. Curious if you've found ways to help them grow in this area without slowing them down.

Adam Broda I've noticed in global teams, even subtle cultural cues can shift how emotional connection is expressed. Sometimes the quietest folks have the richest insights if you listen closely.

The danger is not that AI suddenly becomes anti-human. The danger is colder than that: institutions may use AI to make human needs machine-legible, then mistake that legibility for truth. Safety becomes risk scoring. Belonging becomes engagement management. Esteem becomes reputation analytics. Judgment becomes workflow compliance. Purpose becomes another managed service. That is when AI stops being a tool and becomes an operating theology. The machine does not need to hate humanity to reduce it. It only needs to optimize around the wrong definition of value. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/maslow-stack-ihab-osman-ohk5c

Multiple studies have shown Gen AI is associated with a decline in critical thinking.

Well broken down

Literally, The Matrix, playing out. I laughed thinking that the AI in the movie would need so much energy. Now we see why. 🤣🤣🤣

Happy Memorial Day If you are tired of doing ai alone, you're personally invited to join our community event this Tue May 26 at 7:30 AM CST. Let's exit the matrix and connect with new ways of working together; grounded in love, not fear. Want to be a speaker or leader? Just drop your comment below and we'll save you a seat. First, please take a minute to fill out our quick assessment so we can better support you https://www.nothingai888.com Questions? Reach out to Jason Esler Link To The Event Below https://www.linkedin.com/events/7464110880893341697/?viewAsMember=true

Dan Martell 1000% Dan.

Luís Rodrigues This is a universally relatable breakdown, Luís. My governance mind immediately looks at this anatomy and sees exactly how we protect the health of the system: The Brain (LLM): Needs high-quality nutrients to think clearly. The Library (RAG): Provides the factually accurate books it needs to read. The Hands (Agents): Execute and build with true intention and purpose. The Nervous System (MCP): Stays calm and regulated to ensure total balance and security. Designing the whole body with this kind of holistic health is how we ensure what we build is stable, safe, and enterprise-ready.

This is a covenantal call to governance. A return to the 10 commandments

Exactly what I have been looking for to build my first CoWork agent to enhance daily productivity.

Keith King - I appreciate your post - in fact some of the most powerful moments of the 𝐌𝐚𝐠𝐧𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐚 𝐇𝐮𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐬 presentation from the The Vatican today, were not what people said. It was what people watched. https://shorturl.at/w9CWG

This is one of the most important aspects in a leadership position. Great way of making it easy to understand!

It does not matter what displays or exhibits of trained or educated emotional intelligence smart humans do normally but there are millions others who easily lose their natural or acquired emotional intelligence when they are in any type of crisis mode sounding, behaving, acting and reacting very differently⁉️🤔♾️🧠 “Between stimulus and response, there is a space.⁉️ 🤔♾️🧠 In that space lies our freedom and power to choose our response.🤔♾️🧠👍 In our response lies our growth and freedom.😊♾️🧠👍 ~ Victor E. Frankl ~

Most organizations get the sequence wrong. They stand up the LLM first, test it in isolation, declare it underwhelming, and move on. The brain without the library and the nervous system is just autocomplete on expensive infrastructure. RAG and MCP aren't follow-on features you add later, they're the parts that determine whether the brain has anything real to work with.