Browse Comments — Clean (de-noised)
Close reading of the corpus at each pipeline stage: raw → clean → relevant → coded.
214
comments matched
· page 10 of 11
The real question behind AI is exactly right, who benefits and who sets the direction is the most important conversation we're not having enough
Why do we always have to make it us vs them. The pot cannot call the kettle black.
AI should be used to look inwards not outwards
The real concern isn't just what AI can do, it's how the power dynamics shift. I've seen tech solutions that could help millions but end up benefiting just a handful of people, Pascal. If we don't address this, we risk repeating history where innovation creates more inequality.
Really like the reframing here, and what's easy to miss is that the companies building and deploying these systems are often the ones setting the defaults that end up sticking around for a long time.
The problem isn't with ability, it's with the distribution structure
Oh no. Farm equipment will replace horse and plow then all the farmers and agricultural workers will be out of work. -- no -- they will be more productive and have more free time. This is not the first technological revolution ever.
There's a man who wants more power than the value of what he produces.
Someone will lead in AI. It might not always be us, but for now, we lead.
Jennifer Lowder There is a better way than LLMs and a better way overall.
A very valid point to consider while developing the AI governance framework.
Imagine him as president!!! Makes me think of the series News Room where intelligence actually have merit.
Really thoughtful perspective
This is the conversation we should be having. Technology has always increased productivity, but the real question is how the benefits are distributed. AI isn't just a technical revolution, it's an economic and organizational one. The decisions being made today about ownership, governance, and incentives may matter more than the models themselves.
Siempre la misma canción, unos inventan e invierten por su propio riesgo y la mayoría quiere usarlo sin riesgos ni cargos ni responsabilidades, claro que es un negocio, pero colateralmente hay soluciones que están cambiando el mundo, sin entrar en si lo facilita y mejora o lo complica y lo intoxica. Un cuchillo es un arma que mata o un utensilio para cortar jamón de forma óptima, por supuesto el cuchillero tiene que cobrar su trabajo y artesanía, y habrán luego buenos y malos “utilizadores de cuchillos”
Exactly. 💯
Richard Self What is it with these guys? If someone is claiming that AI can solve massive problems, how can capability not be an issue?
Dr Hinton was part of the problem! What a great success of rebranding oneself!
Bernie Sanders is chicken little: “The sky is falling, the sky is falling!” Be useful Bernie: don’t just point out issues, propose practical solutions to address the issues.
Hector Zenil shameless rebranding