Browse Comments — Raw (as collected)
Close reading of the corpus at each pipeline stage: raw → clean → relevant → coded.
243
comments matched
· page 10 of 13
If AI removes the repetitive work, the next bottleneck becomes judgment and accountability. That is where small teams get stronger, because you stop paying for layers whose main job was coordination theatre. I suspect the winners will redesign roles before they redesign org charts. What human decisions do you think businesses should refuse to automate?
You need peope to work with the AI.
Interesting because history shows productivity breakthroughs do not eliminate human work , they redefine it. The World Economic Forum estimates AI could create 170 million new roles globally by 2030 while displacing 92 million. The challenge is whether society can redesign education, incentives, and economic models fast enough for that transition.
The future of work may become less about repetitive execution and more about creativity, judgment, coordination, and human connection.
This video hits deep
This is brilliant but also uncomfortable for the right reasons.
The joke lands because the question underneath is real.
What stood out for me is this shift: we keep asking what AI will do but not enough what humans are for.
🔵 From an EQAI lens, the answer isn’t “less work”, it’s different work:
→ judgment under uncertainty → meaning-making → building relationships → deciding what should be done, not just what can be done
Because if AI takes execution, humans don’t disappear.
As the Pink Floyd song goes: "Welcome... to... the machine." Certainly we will need societal adjustment, as far as how humans and AI will co-exist. AI should remain an accelerator and facilitator, not a human displacement or replacement, though many jobs will be not just augmented, but eliminated.
lol
Real thing would be human brain connected to AI data centres for rent to do computing with lowest possible energy use.
Your 8 hr shift would be lying down, connected to neural-ink and disconnected from conscious body for that time while serverless compute executes workloads on it.
Perfect sequel to that Apple TV series about mind memory lock by office!? 😅
I never heard biggest bulshit than this
This shows most peoples' lack of vision and creativity if we believe that's all collective human intelligence will amount to.
Wasn’t this a black mirror episode?
The scary part about AI isn’t just job replacement.
It’s that humans get meaning, identity, routine, and social connection from work too.
Society is not psychologically prepared for that conversation yet.
The real question is not what humans will do when AI does the work. It is what humans will do when the work they currently do loses its social meaning. Work provides structure, status, and community. If we automate the output without replacing those three things, we get efficiency without dignity. Pascal naming redesign of participation as the unresolved problem is the hardest truth in the entire AI transition.
Do you honestly think it naturally follows that the net result will be AI, robotics and automation replacing the need for human contribution and we'll have some immediate crisis of purpose? I'd be more afraid of the social engineers stepping in to proactively design a world of purpose. What could go wrong?
Literally, The Matrix, playing out. I laughed thinking that the AI in the movie would need so much energy.
Now we see why. 🤣🤣🤣
The funny part is that the joke makes the real fear easier to say.
If AI removes work without replacing purpose, the problem won’t be unemployment alone. It’ll be identity.
Nice to see that those who run it all are fat as f… that keeps me sane :)
Work is not only income. It is structure, dignity, contribution and purpose. That is the part of this conversation most people skip straight past. Removing people from production without redesigning participation is not a prosperity story. It is an identity crisis at scale.
Black Mirror 😖
I wish we had this problem. I hate doing dishes and cleaning - where are the AIs taking that job from me? I'd love that
The humor aside, there is a real insight here. The relationship between humans and AI is going to look nothing like what most people predict. The businesses that figure out the right balance between automation and human judgment early are going to have a massive advantage over the ones still debating whether to adopt it at all.